Back to School
Today I attended ASU Law School Day. The ASU folks spent the day trying to sell themselves as offering a private school quality education for a public school tuition. This is not the official motto of the Sandra Day O’Connor Law School but the memo about the theme had certainly made the faculty rounds.
I was happy to reconnect with Blair, an L-1, first year law student. (Are you impressed with how I’m already using the jargon?) I’d met Blair, an ASU Law Student Ambassador, when I’d dropped by the school two weeks ago. She is very encouraging of “non-traditional” students as she, herself, is one. Non-traditional is the collegiate way of saying you are OLD. Of course, old in law school means anyone over 26.
I had brought her homemade brownies as a thank you for taking me on a personal tour. The brownies were very well received. (Never underestimate the power of homemade goodies.) Today, I was pleased to be able to walk and talk with her at the same time. On my last visit with her, I had smashed my big toe opening the door to the law library. I bled copiously all over the floor, but decided not to sue as I didn’t think that would help my chances on getting accepted.
For Law School Day, ASU had arranged a tour, talks on curriculum, financial aid and admissions, and a mock law school class. I thought the class discussion in our mock law school class was kind of fun. I found out later that in real life, L-1s do not speak up in class for fear of being flailed. They call this the Socratic Method.
During the talk on admissions, it seemed clear that many of the potential students were trying to ferret out “secrets” to getting accepted to law school, other than good LSAT scores and a good grade point average. But this is like trying to find weight loss “secrets” that don’t involve diet and exercise. Your best bet is to work hard as an undergraduate and study like crazy for the LSAT, which I will be taking December 1.
I currently devote two to three hours a day to my “Cracking the LSAT” workbook. Half the LSAT is logic, which is really common sense. A quarter is reading comprehension and writers are very good readers. So I am okay at both of those. My problem is that the last 25 percent are story problems. Who knew at my age I’d have to fool with story problems again? I never liked them the first time.
These are questions like, “If Mary is cuter than Daphne, but Jill’s father makes more money than Lillian’s father, who is the third choice of Tom to take to the prom and where should they go for dinner beforehand?” Clearly, I have more “Cracking” to do on my LSAT. I wonder is the LSAT board is partial to brownies?

